The 8700k did very well, when compared to other hex-core processors released by Intel in the past. This was the best result while overclocked. I did test the single threaded score several time. With the 2700x over clocked to 4.150 GHz, it achieved a multi-threaded score of 1856 and the single core score went down to 172. Next was the R7 2700x with a multi-threaded score of 1786 and a single core score of 173 at its stock speed of 3.7 GHz. The 9900k sports the highest scores for any chip I’ve personally ever tested. With the 9900k overclocked to 5.0 GHz, it achieved a score of 2129 CB and a single core score of 219 CB. To no surprise, the 9900k did best with a multi-threaded score 2001 CB and a single core score of 204. However, I wouldn’t use it for testing the stability of an overclock.Īll three processors did well in Cinebench R15. It puts the CPU under 100% load, but only for a very short time. Cinebench R15 is one of the most widely used benchmarks used to test the performance. It has both the single thread and full performance test for your CPU, as well as an Open-GL test for your GPU. Cinebench R15īased on MAXON’s award-winning animation software Cinema 4D, CINEBENCH is a real-world cross platform test suite that evaluates your computer’s performance capabilities. The 2700x did best on SinJulia with a score of 13667 and VP8 with a score of 7851. In the FPU tests, the 9900k did best on Julia and Mandel with scored of 78678 on Julia and 42938 on Mandel. The 2700x did best in CPU Hash with 24089, more than double the score of the 9900k with 10749 and more than three times the score of the 8700k with 7382. Photoworx was the 8700k with the highest score of 27431. In CPU Queen, the 9900k came out on top with a score of 100845. In the memory, CPU and FPU testing there really was no clear winner.Each chip came out on top of at least one test or more. I was surprised at how big the gap was between the 9900k and the 2700x. I wasn’t surprised the 9900k did best, or even that the 2700x came in last of the three. Last was the R7 2700x with scores of 4249 in FP- in FP-64. Next was the I7 8700k with scores of 6557 in FP-0 in FP-64. In F3-k scored 946 in the FP-64 benchmark. The I9 9900k did best on both FP-32 and FP-64. We ran both the FP-32 and FP-64 ray-tracing benchmarks in the AIDA64 suite. However, with Ray-Tracing being big in tech news lately, or the lack of ray-tracing I should say, I decided to run these benchmarks. Both benchmarks measure the single and double precision floating-point performance through the computation of a scene with a SIMD-enhanced ray tracing engine. Since each system was different, it’s not a side by side comparison. A quick side note, each processor was tested with different memory, running at different speeds. FPU Julia measures single precision FP, FPU Mandel measures double precision FP, FPU Sin Julia measures extended precision FP while FPU VP8 is a video compression test utilizing the FPU Julia fractal module. CPU Hash is an integer benchmark that measures performance using SHA1 hashing algorithm. CPU AES is a multi-core encryption benchmark that uses Advanced Encryption Standard data encryption. CPU ZLib is a compression benchmark that tests the combined CPU and memory performance. CPU PhotoWorxx tests the SIMD integer arithmetic execution units of the CPU and the memory subsystem. CPU Queen is an integer benchmark that tests branch prediction and misprediction penalties.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |